“Many universities have for too long done just the opposite.” “In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual - not on the basis of race,” he wrote. Still, he warned that the personal essay could not play a stealth role in telegraphing race. “Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration or otherwise,” he wrote. “It’s a complex process, and this opinion will make it even more complex.” “Will it become more opaque? Yes, it will have to,” said Danielle Ren Holley, who is about to take over as president of Mount Holyoke College. Officials at some selective institutions predicted that there would be less emphasis on standardized metrics like test scores and class rank, and more emphasis on personal qualities, told through recommendations and the application essay - the opposite of what many opponents of affirmative action had hoped for. had harsh words for Harvard and the University of North Carolina, calling their admissions process “elusive," “opaque” and “imponderable.”īut the court’s ruling against the two universities on Thursday could lead to an admissions system that is even more subjective and mysterious, as colleges try to follow the law but also admit a diverse class of students. In the Supreme Court decision striking down racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions, Chief Justice John G.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |